3/10/2007

good SciFi

Someone asked me unbelievingly if I could name ANY good Science Fiction, So I said yes, but I couldn't find the names of those fantastic movies. So here are some movies, in a few categories but random order:

These you must see, even if you hate SciFi

must see!2001: A Space Odyssey (1968)
must see!Gattaca (1997)
must see!Minority Report (2002)
must see!Pay check (2003)
must see!Children of Men (2006)

other personal favourites:

earthbound

  • The Time Machine (1960)
  • E.T. (1982)
  • Back to the Future (1985)
  • D.A.R.Y.L. (1985)
  • X-men (2000, 2003, 2006)
  • Reign of Fire (2002)
  • Men in Black (1997, 2003)
  • The Day After Tomorrow (2004)
  • I, Robot (2004)

other worlds

  • Dune (1984)
  • Waterworld (1995)
  • The Fifth Element (1997)
  • Lost in Space (1998)
  • Pitch Black (2000)
  • Final Fantasy (2001)
  • The Chronicles of Riddick (2003)
  • the Matrix (1999, 2003)
  • Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow (2004)
  • Star Wars III, IV, V, VI (2005, 1997, 1980, 1997)
  • Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy (2005)
  • V for Vendetta (2006)

Earthbound hollywood adventure

  • Armageddon (1998)
  • Deep Impact (1998)
  • Independence Day (1996)
  • the Core (2003)
So, after having done this listing I must conclude that whether one thinks SciFi movies are good or bad really is very personal. I wouldn't count any movies like Alien, Species, the thing, close encounters of the ... kind, war of the worlds or any of those as good movies. But that's partially because I'm too scared by them. In my opinion they are only about creapy aliens who wish to destroy mankind. They just don't have much depth or fascinating concepts.
Even those which I call 'hollywood adventure', and have attracted a broad audience, are not very good SciFi movies to my opinion. There's usually just a problem with some rock or something which is going to whipe away all life. You just send a team of clumsy experts, count the deads, leave one romantic couple to survive, end of story.

No, the really interesting movies are those which are either earthbound, but unique in the issues (or techniques) they introduce, or those which play in completely fictional worlds. Both cases allow thought experiments: what if??? What if we could move to another planet? would we destroy it like the earth? What if the day after tomorrow really stood on our doorstep? If we knew it would come, would we change our energy consumption? What if we could make a machine to see the future? What if only perfect children were allowed to be born? What if humankind were on the brink of extinction? How will humankind survive the problems it creates for itself?
And for the other worlds: how does a planet prescribe our lives? How would we live in a desert-world, or an ocean world, or a fire world? What would economics be like in a world of scarcity? How would politics be different or the same? Would old hierarchies re-emerge, or would new political systems come to be? Would there be oppression, discrimination or genocide between species or cultures? Where does the human kind stand between aliens? What does it mean to be human?

I think SciFi enriches us, because it allows us to think about what our lives and opinions would be like if our reality were different. And that can make you realise that some things we see as normal are actually really special. Think of the 60 years of peace Western Europe has recently experienced, think of democracy, family life, legal systems, social systems, freedom of religion, freedom of speech, the fact that we can make computers and virtual worlds, that we can go into space, that we can drink from our taps (all of these hold for the Netherlands). SciFi allows one to look at ethics, humanity, politics and religion in a totally different context. And from that we can only learn. Because to come up with a totally fictional world (and for a movie watcher to understand it) one must make paralels with our earth, and our history. So it will automatically make us think about the present state of the world and humanity, and about our future. It will make us think how we get allong with our neighbours.

People who are not interested in science fiction strike me as people who just don't see the deeper meaning of it. They don't see that SciFi can actually learn us something, but often only if you look at the earth on a planetary scale. And that is not something these people are used to. They are not very aware that all people of the earth are part of one humankind, moving towards a common future, and living on a single earth. Their awareness and interest does not expand far beyond their own personal lives, and the community they live in.
It is normal to only have attention for the problems which affect our personal lives. We only care about issues in the family, or maybe in the town we live in, and to a lesser extent in our country. But what goes on on a continental scale or larger, is usually not really an issue for our dayly lives. That's for politicians to work out.
But I think this is an oldfashioned symplification of matters, which allows us to sleep tightly when we really should be ashamed of ourselves. We live in a globalized world today. We use resources from all over the world, have contact and do business with people from everywhere. We get news from what happens everywhere.
If a friend would tell us that our sister had been raped, we would immediately take action, and help the girl. Why then do we turn away of the misfortunes of our fellow-men in faraway lands? How can we keep ignoring that we are even the cause of some of that misfortune? Just because we are not confronted with what the consequences are of our consumption, does not mean we should not take responsibility for it. If our consumption influences people and the environment in another part of the world, then we should care about that part of the world. Then we should see that we make use of the earth, and should feel responsible for its present state, and for its future.
And if we want to actively influence the future state of the world and its population, then we should first develop ideas about that future. And here is where I think SciFi is important. It raises awareness of a single human kind, on a single earth with limited resources. And if the boat sinks, we all go down with it. So we had better work together to stop this world from deteriorating! And apart of raising the awarenes of a global community, SciFi allows us to explore different worlds and different forms of social structures: different futures (utopias).

And for the very far future, if we manage to discover other habitable worlds, perhaps human kind could survive even after the earth and its sun have already passed away. I think that would be a great achievement. Because in a certain sence, it would make the human kind immortal. And because every person is part of this human kind, and has worked towards this achievement. This would make each and every person immortal. And is that not what most religious people strive for?

2 comments:

Cjestmir said...

Wow, Cheryl, that's quite a prologue. You stated it very well.
And I can realy identify with your feelings.

Just some extra thoughts:
An other point of view is that SciFi opens possibilities for writers to project political subjects that are not allowed to be written or are not very well accepted to be written. As you stated the last 60 years of warfree time in western europe is something you come te realize when you read the old SciFi's from about 50 years ago.
I am not aware, but it should be that great SciFi books are still beeing written but I think that the authors will not be from the so-called free countries. In an oppressed society, writers can use the power of SciFi to write down their feelings without the risk of being prececuted.

That is one thing that makes SciFi so great to read, the deeper meaning behind the words that describe a different world or time, but actually describing the world the writer, and with them we all, live in.

This deeper meaning is what is completely absent in Fantasy books, which only describe a nice world without the possibility of reflecting the story to the real life.

I think that many people can not see the difference between SciFi and Fantasy. Quite some knowledge about the world we life in is needed to see the other side of SciFi. And perhaps it is good that not everyone is able to see this reflection with the real world. Writers would then not have been able to use SciFi for their criticism.

X, Cjestmir.

Gerson said...

Interestingly enough, my first impression about this post was quite negative: help, again a sci-fi freak, who wants to sell her belief in SciFi! The films you give to be great examples of SciFi, I find really boring and without any depth (except of course The Matrix (only first episode though!)).
No good start! However, when I read further, I have to admit you have a point. SciFi indeed provides interesting debates about the society! It keeps us awake. Sometimes you do not even realize you are watching SciFi! (I mean: why should the Matrix be SciFi? Or some documentary-like films about American Presidents...).

The difference between SciFi and Phantasy, I think is not always that large: good Phantasy shows another world in which often contemporary issue's play an important role! Unfortunately, besides some of Tolkien's books, Phantasy is to me as boring as SciFi! Although you might learn something of it, whether it is "good", will always depend on personal preferences.
Have to admit, your post changed my view on SciFi now!
Nice to put it so clear! Especially the last part: the world nowadays is moving to one big collection of individualism and people do not really care about their neighbours. Still, we managed to really improve life quality (food/education) of everyone on earth! That's quite an achievement :).

p.s. You should have made several posts of this one! It is just too much to comment it all! ;)